Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Cobble v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2018ct03050
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, US Bureau of Prisons, US Marshals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Cobble v. Atkinson et al
as 5:2017hc02153
Petitioner:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Respondent:
Kenny Atkinson, Jeff Sessions, US Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Green v. Dye et al
as 5:2017cv00103
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Green
Defendant:
Eric Dye, FNU Gamewell, FNU Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hegeman v. Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00125
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hegeman
Defendant:
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc., E. James Ferland and Jenny L. Apker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ollila v. Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00109
Plaintiff:
Eric Ollila
Defendant:
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc., E. James Ferland and Jenny L. Apker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
600 Creekside LLC v. Scottsdale Insurance Company, et al
as 4:2015cv00179
Plaintiff:
600 Creekside LLC
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company, Nationwide Corporation, Burns & Wilcox Reinsurance, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Wilcox v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
as 5:2014cv00152
Plaintiff:
Brian Wilcox
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Jacobs et al v. Iredell County et al
as 5:2014cv00091
Plaintiff:
Cindi Jacobs and Maureen Wilcox
Defendant:
Iredell County, Christine Royal, Ron Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilcox v. Corpening
as 2:2014cv00016
Petitioner:
Torrey F. Wilcox
Respondent:
Hubert Corpening
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
