Cases 21 - 30 of 155
TRENOSKY et al v. STOP & SHOP 100853 et al
as 2:2021cv19516
Plaintiff:
LILIANA TRENOSKY and AGUSTIN TRENOSKY
Defendant:
STOP & SHOP 100853, JOHN DOE (I-X) and ABC CORP. (I-X)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GOMEZ-AMAYA v. DENTON et al
as 2:2021cv18173
Plaintiff:
GERSON GOMEZ-AMAYA
Defendant:
KATHRYN A DENTON, NATIONAL GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, JOHN DOE I-X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SULLIVAN v. ESSEX COUNTY et al
as 2:2021cv14115
Plaintiff:
OMAR SULLIVAN
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY, ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, TIMOTHY R. PENTIMONE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Simeonidis v. Long et al
as 1:2021cv04179
Defendant:
John Doe I-X, Kyle Long, ABC Corp. I-X and others
Plaintiff:
Christina Simeonidis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 au
SIMEONIDIS v. LONG et al
as 2:2021cv04429
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA SIMEONIDIS
Defendant:
DBA LIVE SOUND COMPANY, KYLE LONG, JOHN DOE I-X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KIM v. PEMBERTON et al
as 2:2021cv04418
Plaintiff:
MR. JU KIM and JU KIM
Defendant:
ANGELA M PEMBERTON, STEVE PEMBERTON, JOHN DOE I-X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
P.S. v. Lazy River Resort, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00375
Defendant:
John Does I-X, ABC Employer I-X, ABC Corp. I-X and others
Plaintiff:
P.S.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MACAS-DOMINGUEZ et al v. BONEFISH GRILL, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv10195
Defendant:
JOHN DOES I-X, ABC CORP. I-X, BONEFISH GRILL, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON BOULEY and MARTHA MACAS-DOMINGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ROSEN v. TARGET CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv01127
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROSEN
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, TOWNSHIP OF CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
