Cases 21 - 30 of 1,314
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nunn v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01130
Plaintiff:
Alexander W Nunn
Defendant:
CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC. and COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC
Interested Party:
KENNETH HASSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Moffa v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Alexander M. Moffa
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
IN RE: RIVERA
as 2:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER RIVERA
Defendant:
FAMILY COURT OF PHILADELPHIA CHILD SUPPORT PROGRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TICE v. WILSON et al.
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBERT TICE
Defendant:
HARRY E. WILSON, PA STATE POLICE, MEGAN'S LAW SECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALEXANDER v. PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
LEE ALEXANDER
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY and JACOB SECORE
WADE v. C.O. CARTER et al
as 2:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
PAUL ALEXANDER WADE, 3RD
Defendant:
C.O. CARTER, C.O. PEEPLES and C.O. SHEPERD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON et al v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON, THOMAS W. MCCUNE, BRIAN NELSON and others
Defendant:
LAUREL HENRY, SUPERINTENDANT R. IRWIN, DEPUTY SUPT. I. GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, G. LETTLE, G. LITTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BENNETT v. SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP et al
as 2:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
JO BENNETT
Defendant:
SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP, BARRY S ALEXANDER, SAMANTHA J BANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
