Cases 21 - 30 of 30
James Lundeen, Sr. v. Nicholas Rhoad, et al
as 16-2019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES E. LUNDEEN, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
NICHOLAS RHOAD, Director of the Indiana Professional Licensing Agnecy, STEPHEN L. HUDDLESTON, President, Medical Licensing Board of Indiana, AMBER SWARTZELL, Deputy Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General of Indiana and others
PARKS v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2014cv01973
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA, STATE OF INDIANA, UNION COUNTY PROSECUTOR and others
Plaintiff:
WARREN PARKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOWTON v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 3:2013cv00164
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
Petitioner:
JACK EUGENE HOWTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
as 1:2013cv00262
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
Petitioner:
PETER BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Peter Brown v. Attorney General of Indiana
as 11-2966
Petitioner - Appellant:
PETER BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
Peter Brown v. Office of the Attorney Genera
as 10-1748
Petitioner - Appellant:
PETER BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
Peter Brown v. Attorney General of Indiana
as 08-2894
Petitioner - Appellant:
PETER BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
Peter Brown v. Attorney General of Indiana
as 08-2609
Petitioner - Appellant:
PETER BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
BROWN v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
as 1:2008cv00567
Petitioner:
PETER BROWN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BROWN v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
as 2:2007cv00109
Petitioner:
PETER BROWN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
