Cases 21 - 26 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-16919
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00441
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
State of Arizona, et al v. Harkins Amusement Enterprises,, et al
as 08-16075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF ARIZONA, ex rel. Terry Goddard, the Attorney General and CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF LAW
Defendant - Appellee:
HARKINS AMUSEMENT ENTERPRISES, INC., HARKINS ENTERPRISES, INC., HARKINS CAMEL VIEW THEATRES, INC. and others
Petitioner-intervenor - Appellant:
FREDERICK LINDSTROM
Plaintiff-intervenor - Appellant:
LARRY WANGER
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL DISABILITY RIGHTS NETWORK, ALEXANDER GRAHAM BELL ASSOCIATION FOR THE DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING, A.G. Bell, AMERICAN COUNCIL OF THE BLIND and others
State of Arizona et al v. Marana Health Center Inc.
as 4:2007cv00387
Defendant:
Marana Health Center and Marana Health Center
Plaintiff:
State of Arizona, Terry Goddard, The Civil Rights Division of the Arizona Department of Law and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Goddard et al v. Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. et al.
as 2:2007cv00703
Defendant:
Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. , Harkins Enterprises, Inc. , Harkins Camel View Theatres, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Terry L Goddard and Arizona Department of Law
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Frederick Lindstrom and Larry Wanger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Cofield v. State of Arizona, ex rel. Terry Goddard, Attorney General, the Civil Rights Division of the Arizona Department of Law and Judy Drickey-Prohow et al
as 2:2007cv00314
Plaintiff:
Steve Cofield
Defendant:
State of Arizona, ex rel. Terry Goddard, Attorney General, the Civil Rights Division of the Arizona Department of Law and Judy Drickey-Prohow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
