Cases 21 - 30 of 34
BALDWIN v. SMITH
as 1:2016cv01330
Petitioner:
LYNN BARNARD BALDWIN
Respondent:
THOMAS B. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Boyd v. Smith
as 5:2016hc02174
Petitioner:
Darnell Boyd
Respondent:
Thomas B. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Baldwin v. Smith
as 5:2016hc02081
Petitioner:
Lynn Barnard Baldwin
Respondent:
Thomas B. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Smith
as 5:2015hc02278
Petitioner:
Randall S. Williams
Respondent:
Thomas B. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GOODWIN v. CLARK, ET AL.
as 1:2015cv00458
Plaintiff:
WESLEY FOUST-GRAHAM GOODWIN
Defendant:
SUSAN KELLY GOODWIN CLARK, NC STATE BAR, NORMAN B. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Retirement Committee of DAK Americas LLC, et al v. Smith, et al
as 7:2014cv00036
Plaintiff:
Retirement Committee of DAK Americas LLC and Transamerica Retirement Solutions Corporation
Defendant:
Rodney B. Smith , Otella Irene Webb , Jerome Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wood v. Chadwick et al
as 5:2010ct03039
Plaintiff:
Homer Avery Wood
Defendant:
Beth Chadwick, John B. Smith, Donald V. Micklos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashcraft, et al v. Conoco, Inc., et al
as 7:1995cv00187
Plaintiff:
Hurshel L. Ashcraft , All Plaintiffs , Frances L. Ashcraft and others
Defendant:
Conoco, Inc. , Kayo Oil Company and Triangle Facilities, Inc.
Movant:
United States of America , J. Harold Seagle, George Rountree, III and others
Respondent:
Kirsten B. Mitchell , Cory Reiss and Wilmington Morning Star
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act
Smith v. Michael J. Astrue
as 3:2009cv00436
Plaintiff:
Suzanne B Smith
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
