Cases 21 - 30 of 100
McRae v. Stamford's Police Department et al
as 3:2020cv01527
Defendant:
Baker, Phillips, Stamford's Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Keon Tamar McRae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Mr. Happy's, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01242
Plaintiff:
Shamari Smith and Nayasia Baker
Defendant:
Mr. Happy's, Inc. doing business as Mr. Happy's Cafe and Frederick Toupin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McRae v. Phillips et al
as 3:2020cv00830
Defendant:
Baker, Phillips and DeRocco
Plaintiff:
Keon Tamar McRae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv00063
Plaintiff:
Sandra Baker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pal v. Canepari et al
as 3:2020cv00013
Defendant:
Joseph Bryson, Mark Canepari, Drew Kennedy and others
Plaintiff:
Neelu Pal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Innamorato et al v. QCP, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00011
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corp, DAVID FABRICATORS OF NEW YORK, INC., QCP, INC F/K/A BAKERS PRIDE OVEN COMPANY, INC and others
Plaintiff:
Joann Innamorato and Joseph Innamorato
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gross et al v. Bluechip Financial et al
as 3:2019cv01520
Defendant:
Jamie Azure, Vice Chairman Lynn Gourneau, Carson Belgarde and others
Plaintiff:
Beverly Gross and Krista Biehl
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00337
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Baker et al v. Trustees of the Colt Bequest
as 3:2019cv00301
Plaintiff:
Laurie Baker St. Laurent and Sharen S Baker
Defendant:
Trustees of the Colt Bequest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
