Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Arias v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 3:2011cv00191
Plaintiff:
Pedro Gutierrez Arias
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. KIELY et al
as 3:2011cv00013
Defendant:
DEPUTY MATT F. KEPPLER, FBI AGENT BRIAN FLAHERTY, FORMER CONGRESSMAN BRAD ELLSWORTH and others
Plaintiff:
JESHA DONALDSON MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
TURNER v. SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS et al
as 3:2010cv00174
Defendant:
MR. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA and SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. TURNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TURNER v. SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS et al
as 3:2010cv00158
Defendant:
MR. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA and SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. TURNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
GERVACIO v. SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS et al
as 1:2010cv01388
Plaintiff:
RODRIGO ABAD GERVACIO
Defendant:
MR. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA and SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TURNER v. SIX UNKNOWN NAMES, AGENTS et al
as 3:2010cv00116
Defendant:
MR. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA and SIX UNKNOWN NAMES, AGENTS
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. TURNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STANKO v. OBAMA et al
as 3:2010cv00105
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, CHARLES LOCKET, MICHAEL MCNALLEY and others
Plaintiff:
RUDY STANKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
GERVACIO et al v. SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS et al
as 1:2010cv00618
Petitioner:
RODRIGO ABAD GERVACIO and YOUNG YIL JO
Respondent:
MR. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA and SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gutierrez Arias et al v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 3:2010cv00105
Plaintiff:
Pedro Gutierrez Arias and Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
