Cases 21 - 30 of 92
RICER v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv00253
Defendant:
ELIQUITECH, INC., JAMES MONSEES, ALTRIA ENTERPRISES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MASSON RICER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALTON v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 4:2020cv00197
Defendant:
JAMES MONSEES, ALTRIA ENTERPRISES LLC, MOTHER MURPHY'S LABS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
RAIDEN WALTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANDERS v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv02341
Defendant:
ELIQUITECH, INC., JAMES MONSEES, ALTRIA ENTERPRISES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ANDERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Powell v. Bowen et al
as 3:2020cv00698
Defendant:
L A Van Natta, Burckett, Huffman and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Vance Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLeod v. Bowen et al
as 3:2020cv00525
Plaintiff:
Bradley McLeod
Defendant:
Bowen, James Henry, SBCRC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowens v Sunshine Retirement Living, LLC
as 3:2020cv00379
Plaintiff:
AMBER BOWENS
Defendant:
SUNSHINE RETIREMENT LIVING, LLC and Sunshine Retirement Living, LLC doing business as Heritage Point Assisted Living and Memory Care
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
PARKER v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2020cv00341
Defendant:
B. BOWEN, M. ROBERTS and A. TRIVETT
Plaintiff:
JAYLYN THOMAS PARKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALE v. HAMILTON COUNTY et al
as 1:2020cv00113
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., D/B/A CORIZON, LLC, MATTHEW LAWSON, EL HADJI NDLAYE and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. BALE, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF TYLER A. BALE, DECEASED and JAMES D. BALE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Krull v. Hassel et al
as 3:2019cv00881
Defendant:
Robert Bowen, Tami Napier and Matthew Hassel
Plaintiff:
Brian D Krull
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cottrell v. Bowen et al
as 3:2019cv00695
Plaintiff:
David William Boone Cottrell and David Cottrell
Defendant:
Tami Napier, Robert O Bowen and E. Nelson Chipman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
