Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. White et al
as 4:2021cv02928
Defendant:
Judge Richard Seeborg, Judge Joseph C. Spero, Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. Freeman et al
as 4:2021cv02052
Defendant:
Judge Beth Labson Freeman and Judge Howard R. Lloyd
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. Freeman et al
as 4:2021cv01576
Defendant:
Judge Beth Labson Freeman and Judge R. Howard White
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. Freeman
as 4:2021cv01090
Defendant:
Judge Beth Labson Freeman
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 21-15001
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD SEEBORG, KIMBERLY MCCRICKARD, WILLIAM H. ORRICK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUANG-BAO P. OU-YOUNG and KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG
Hume v. Fineman et al
as 4:2020cv09381
Defendant:
Peter J. Siggins, Beth Labson Freeman, Iona Petrou and others
Plaintiff:
Edward D. Hume
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ou-Young v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2020cv09097
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA, County of Santa Clara, Kimberly McCrickard and others
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P Ou-Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lawyers United Inc., et al v. USA, et al
as 20-5269
Defendant / Appellee:
Randy Smith, Judicial Circuit Judge, James M. Lorenz, District Judge, Mark Walker and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Evelyn Aimee DeJesus and Lawyers United Inc.
Not Yet Classified:
Allan Wainwright
Bonilla v. Clay
as 4:2020cv04304
Defendant:
Michael E. Delllastrillo, Toni Cantil-Sakauye, Andrew G. Schopler and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
