Cases 21 - 30 of 272
MIDDLEBROOKS v. CITY OF MACON-BIBB COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 5:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
LILLIE M MIDDLEBROOKS
Defendant:
CITY OF MACON-BIBB COUNTY GEORGIA, ERICA L WOODFORD, TAMIKA BURNETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bibb County, Alabama et al v. McKinsey and Company Inc
as 3:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Bibb County, Alabama, Cherokee County, Alabama, City of Cullman, Alabama and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bibb County, Alabama et al v. McKinsey and Company Inc
as 7:2022cv01601
Plaintiff:
Bibb County, Alabama, Cherokee County, Alabama, City of Cullman, Alabama and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-13291
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-13286
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-13285
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Christopher Richardson v. David Davis, et al
as 22-12644
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL RICHARDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF OF MACON-BIBB COUNTY, DAVID DAVIS, MACON-BIBB COUNTY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Vanessa Phillips v. Macon Bibb County Government
as 22-10930
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VANESSA A. PHILLIPS
Defendant / Appellee:
MACON BIBB COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
