Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Conway v. Schultz et al
as 1:2015cv01122
Plaintiff:
Darryl Conway
Defendant:
. Schultz, . Gainer, Easterbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Madigan et al
as 1:2014cv08294
Plaintiff:
Donald A Smith
Defendant:
Lisa Madigan, Anita Alvarez, Paul P Biebel, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martini v. Biebel Roofing Company, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00125
Plaintiff:
John Martini
Defendant:
Biebel Roofing Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Indiana State Council of Roofers Health & Welfare Fund Trustees of the v. Biebel Roofing Co Inc
as 4:2013cv00080
Plaintiff:
Indiana State Council of Roofers Health & Welfare Fund Trustees of the
Defendant:
Biebel Roofing Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Henderson v. Kazmierski et al
as 1:2012cv02998
Plaintiff:
Johnnie L. Henderson
Defendant:
Joseph Kazmierski, Timothy Evans and Paul Biebel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Indiana State Council of Roofers Health & Welfare Fund Trustees of the et al v. Biebel Roofing Co Inc
as 4:2012cv00020
Plaintiff:
Indiana State Council of Roofers Health & Welfare Fund Trustees of the
Defendant:
Biebel Roofing Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Worthem et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2012cv00051
Plaintiff:
James M. Worthem and Carmine Palella
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Cook County Circuit Clerk, Cook County State Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biebel v. Dismas Charties, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv03786
Plaintiff:
Peter Biebel
Defendant:
Dismas Charties, Inc., R. L. James, Jimmy Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennie Ellison v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 11-2881
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENNIE K. ELLISON
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, JOSEPH KAZMIERSKI, Judge, JUDGE HOOKS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
