Cases 21 - 30 of 72
Tillery v. Turman et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
James Tillery
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peacock v. Turman et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
Caleb Peacock
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Turman et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
Justin Hunter
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Turman et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Tristan Tyler Lawson
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Turman et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
Austin Parker
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hewitt v. Turman et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Russell Hewitt
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sikes v. Turman et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Sikes, III
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gentry v. Turman et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Gentry
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephens v. Turman et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
Matthew Stephens
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Turman et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
Jamerick Taylor
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
