Cases 21 - 30 of 78
First American Title Insurance Co. v. Bowles Rice, L.L.P.
as 1:2016cv00219
Plaintiff:
First American Title Insurance Co.
Defendant:
Bowles Rice, L.L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washington v. Gillespie et al
as 2:2016cv10191
Plaintiff:
Josephine Louella Washington
Defendant:
Melissa Gillespie, Melissa Shephard, Meghan Gofreda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Gillespie et al
as 2:2016cv10195
Plaintiff:
Josephine Louella Washington
Defendant:
Melissa Gillespie, Melissa Shephard, Meghan Gofreda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glasser v. Bowling et al
as 2:2015cv01411
Plaintiff:
Derek Robert Glasser and C.D.G.
Defendant:
Karen Bowling , Casey Adkins , Melissa McCumbers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowling v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08929
Plaintiff:
Amanda Bowling
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Proctor v. South Central Regional Jail et al
as 2:2016cv07732
Plaintiff:
Dakota Steven Proctor
Defendant:
South Central Regional Jail and Anthony Bowling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Innovative Resource Group, LLC v. Bowling et al
as 2:2016cv06475
Plaintiff:
Innovative Resource Group, LLC
Defendant:
Karen Bowling and West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bowles et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv03718
Plaintiff:
Michelle Bowles and Wayne Bowles
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowling v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03239
Plaintiff:
Laura Bowling
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blackstone v. Masters et al
as 1:2013cv22762
Plaintiff:
Richard Scott Blackstone
Defendant:
Mr. Masters, F.C.I. McDowell Institution and employees, Karen Hogsten and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
