Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Chatmon v. Gibson et al
as 4:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Rolandis Chatmon
Defendant:
James Gibson, Brandon Carroll and Flora Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rahman X v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv01036
Plaintiff:
Rahman X
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, James Gibson, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00828
Plaintiff:
Cordarious Willis
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshall Dale Reed, James Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson et al v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00796
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Robertson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slocum v. Gibson et al
as 4:2022cv00555
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lamont Slocum
Defendant:
James Gibson, Floria Washington and Brandon Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radford v. Carroll et al
as 4:2022cv00453
Plaintiff:
Jessie Radford
Defendant:
Brandon Carroll, James Gibson, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Washington et al
as 4:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
Thelma Williams
Defendant:
Washington, Todd Ball, James Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Ball et al
as 4:2022cv00208
Plaintiff:
Thelma Williams
Defendant:
Todd Ball, James Gibson, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv00936
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Pitts
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, James Gibson, James Shipman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kimery v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv00209
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Roy Griffin, Marshal Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Fielding Vaughn Kimery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
