Cases 21 - 30 of 305
Scott v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv12683
Plaintiff:
Brian Scott
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BURNS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03174
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SCOTT BURNS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Austin v. Pacheco
as 6:2022cv01312
Plaintiff:
Brian Scott Austin
Defendant:
Juan C. Pacheco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
BORAKOVE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv25086
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SCOTT BORAKOVE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Berryman v. Cain et al
as 1:2022cv00140
Petitioner:
Brian Scott Berryman
Respondent:
Burl Cain and Mississippi Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henry v. State Correctional Institution-Muncy et al
as 1:2022cv01391
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Henry
Defendant:
State Correctional Institution-Muncy and Brian Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bluestein et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
Lynda Bluestein and Diana Barnard
Defendant:
Phillip Brian Scott, Susanne Young, Mark Levine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PEARCE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16283
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SCOTT PEARCE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MALLETT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15168
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SCOTT MALLETT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KIEFAT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11885
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SCOTT KIEFAT and BRIAN S KIEFAT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
