Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 74
Lakeisha Adams v. James Rogers, Warden
as 14-31004
Petitioner - Appellant: LAKEISHA SHANAE ADAMS
Respondent - Appellee: JAMES ROGERS, WARDEN, C. PAUL PHELPS CORRECTIONAL CENTER
PAUL v. TSOUKARIS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv05208
Plaintiff: AKASH C. PAUL
Defendant: JOHN TSOUKARIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Paul v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv04335
Defendant: Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck, Sharp & Dohme, Corp.
Plaintiff: Frankie C. Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Burnes v. Covisint Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv05361
Plaintiff: Nadean Burnes
Defendant: Covisint Corporation , David A. Mcguffie , Enrico Digirolamo and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Darius Patterson v. Steve Rader, Warden
as 14-30747
Petitioner - Appellant: DARIUS PATTERSON
Respondent - Appellee: STEVE RADER, WARDEN, C. PAUL PHELPS CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Kimberlin Edwards v. James Rogers, Warden
as 14-30733
Petitioner - Appellant: KIMBERLIN EDWARDS
Respondent - Appellee: JAMES ROGERS, WARDEN, C PAUL PHELPS CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Desrocher v. Covisint Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv03878
Plaintiff: Karen J Desrocher
Defendant: Covisint Corporation , David A Mcguffie , Enrico Digirolamo and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Richard Miller v. James LeBlanc, et al
as 14-30441
Petitioner - Appellant: RICHARD NATHANIEL MILLER, also known as Richard J. Miller
Respondent - Appellee: JAMES M. LEBLANC, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS and STEVE RADER, WARDEN, C. PAUL PHELPS CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00521
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Humberto Vargas v. Steve Rader, Warden
as 14-30064
Petitioner - Appellant: HUMBERTO VARGAS
Respondent - Appellee: STEVE RADER, WARDEN, C. PAUL PHELPS CORRECTIONAL CENTER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?