Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Madera Merchant Services, LLC et al
as 5:2019mc00009
Defendant:
Patricia Woods as an owner, manager and/or member of Madera Merchant Services, LLC and B&P Enterprises, LLC, Victor Rodriguez, Patricia Woods and others
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio ex rel. Attorney General Dave Yost and Federal Trade Commission
Wood v. County of Contra Costa et al
as 3:2019cv04266
Defendant:
Thomas Maddock, Mary P. Carey, Lois Haight and others
Plaintiff:
Andrea C. Wood and Andrea Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Williams et al
as 3:2019cv04247
Defendant:
Edyth Williams and County of Contra Costa
Plaintiff:
Andrea C. Wood and Andrea Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Carl Kelly v. C. Wood et al
as 2:2019cv06373
Defendant:
Head Psychologist Porter, CCI Williams, C Wood and others
Petitioner:
James Carl Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Chidi et al
as 3:2019cv04202
Defendant:
Acacia Chidi, Edyth Williams and County of Contra Costa
Plaintiff:
Andrea C. Wood and Andrea Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Franklin v. R. Franklin et al
as 2:2019cv06255
Defendant:
Correctional Officer D. Moore, E. Delgadillo, Lieutenant A. H. Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darren L. Harris v. Gonzalez et al
as 2:2019cv06119
Defendant:
C. Wood, Z. Soisuvarn, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Darren L. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. County of Contra Costa et al
as 5:2019cv03885
Respondent:
Benjamin Packwood, M.D. Ravinder Bains, Lois Haight and others
Petitioner:
Andrea C. Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kelly v. Wood et al
as 3:2019cv03806
Defendant:
C. Wood, Head Psychologist Porter, CCI Williams and others
Plaintiff:
James Carl Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCurty v. Aguirre et al
as 4:2019cv03090
Defendant:
G Morales, G.G. Lopez, J Ibarra and others
Plaintiff:
Michael McCurty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
