Cases 21 - 30 of 86
CALHOUN v. 61 PA STAT 331.21 (1941)
as 2:2017cv04535
Plaintiff:
TROY CALHOUN
Defendant:
61 PA STAT 331.21 (1941)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calhoun v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv01292
Plaintiff:
Ruth Ann Calhoun
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CALHOUN v. SMITH et al
as 3:2017cv00025
Petitioner:
GARY CALHOUN
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CAMBRIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CALHOUN v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv00242
Plaintiff:
SUZETTE EVELINE CALHOUN
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RODEHEAVER v. NELSON et al
as 3:2016cv00209
Plaintiff:
BRENTON CORY RODEHEAVER
Defendant:
TROY NELSON, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BAKER, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER STEVIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURGIS et al v. BAYER CORP., et al
as 2:2016cv03589
Plaintiff:
MANDY BURGIS , AMANDA BURLESON , NATASHA BURNS and others
Defendant:
BAYER CORP. , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC , BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CALHOUN v. CITY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2016cv02448
Plaintiff:
TIA RENEE CALHOUN
Defendant:
CITY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA, DANIEL WHITE, POLICE OFFICER JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CALHOUN v. SUPERINTENDENT CAMERON et al
as 3:2015cv00191
Petitioner:
GARY CALHOUN
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT CAMERON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CALHOUN v. GLINT et al
as 3:2014cv00189
Petitioner:
GARY CALHOUN
Respondent:
STEVEN R. GLINT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CAMBRIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CALHOUN v. COLVIN
as 2:2013cv05220
Plaintiff:
REGINA CALHOUN
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
