Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 77
United States of America et al v. Kohler Co. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv00683
Plaintiff: People of the State of California, ex rel. California Air Resources Board and United States of America
Defendant: Kohler Co.
State of California, et al v. USEPA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-17480
Defendant / Appellant: ANDREW WHEELER, Acting Aministrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW MEXICO and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND
Defendant: E. SCOTT PRUITT, Administrator, U.S. EPA
USA v. State of California et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv02142
Defendant: Richard Bloom, Jared Blumenfeld, Gavin C. Newsom and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
State of California, et al v. Andrew Wheeler, et al
as 19-1239
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency, Andrew Wheeler, in his official capacity as Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Elaine L. Chao, in her official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Transportation and others
Petitioner: State of Colorado, City of Los Angeles, State of New Jersey and others
State of California, et al v. EPA, et al
as 19-1227
Petitioner: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State of Rhode Island, State of Vermont and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Andrew Wheeler, in his official capacity as Administrator
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00965
Defendant: NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION and UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Plaintiff: CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Sowinski v. California Air Resources Board We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1558
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD SOWINSKI
Defendant / Appellee: CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD
USA, et al v. Montrose Chemical, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:1990cv03122
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Simpson Paper Company, Potlatch Corporation, Montrose Chemical Corporation of California and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Anaheim City of, Garden Grove Sanitary District, San Fernando City of and others
Defendant: County Sanitation District No. 2 of Los Angeles County, County Sanitation District of Los Angeles, Rhone Poulenc Inc and others
Counter Defendant: Dept of Interior, Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board, State of California Air Resources Board and others
Cross Defendant: Does 1 through 40,000, being a class of persons & entities similarly situated
Plaintiff: United States of America and California State Of
Intervenor: Travelers Indemnity Co
Special Master: John Francis Carroll
Amicus Curiae: Council of American Survey Research Organizations Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
State of California et al v. Zinke et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv05712
Defendant: Bureau of Land Management, Joseph Balash, Department of the Interior and others
Plaintiff: California Air Resources Board, State of New Mexico, Xavier Becerra and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club, Dine Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment and others
Intervenor: Independent Petroleum Association of America and Western Energy Alliance
Intervenor Defendant: State of Wyoming
Consolidated Defendant: United States Department of the Interior
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Sowinski v. California Air Resources Board
as 3:2018cv03979
Plaintiff: Richard Sowinski
Defendant: California Air Resources Board
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?