Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. v. Bonilla-Morales et al
as 3:2016cv01158
Plaintiff:
Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Luis Ramon Bonilla-Morales, Jane Doe, Conjugal Partnership Bonilla-Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ortiz-Marrero et al v. Marina Las Gaviotas Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv02381
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Ortiz-Marrero , Nestor R Rodriguez-Aponte , Margie Rola-Zabala and others
Defendant:
Marina Las Gaviotas Corporation, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico , Popular Mortgage, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Potter, Jr. v. Ricon et al
as 6:2015cv01251
Plaintiff:
Isaac A. Potter, Jr.
Defendant:
Camilo Ricon, Maria Regina R Flores, Javier E. Tello and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company v. Ruiz-Rodriguez
as 3:2015cv01818
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company
Defendant:
Carlos Alberto Ruiz-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Enrique v. Carmados, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv21457
Plaintiff:
Hugo Enrique
Defendant:
Carmados, LLC , The Knife Payroll, LLC , The Knife Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Capmechano Ruiz et al v. Monterey of Lusby, Inc. et al
as 8:2013cv03792
Plaintiff:
Faustino Campechano Ruiz and Carlos Romeo Ruiz Ruiz
Defendant:
Monterey of Lusby, Inc., Luiz Rodriguez, Ronald Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
USA v. Carlos Ruiz-Chavez
as 13-41226
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CARLOS GILBERTO RUIZ-CHAVEZ
Garcia Ruiz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv01369
Plaintiff:
Carlos Garcia Ruiz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Garcia Ruiz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013at00616
Plaintiff:
Carlos Garcia Ruiz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
