Cases 21 - 30 of 480
BAES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21302
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CHARLES LEE BAES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Charles Avery
as 22-7179
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES LEE AVERY
GOLDMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19091
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LEE GOLDMAN, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KAMUF v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18488
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LEE KAMUF
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MidFirst Bank v. Robinson et al
as 4:2022cv03009
Plaintiff:
MidFirst Bank
Defendant:
Curtis Jerome Robinson, Nicole Michelle Robinson, Ella Shaw As Legal Guardian Of Minor T.M. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Axis Insurance Company v. Lee
as 2:2022cv01243
Plaintiff:
Axis Insurance Company doing business as Axis Surplus Insurance Company
Defendant:
Charles Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Aguilar et al v. New Dairydel, Inc. et al
as 7:2022cv03700
Plaintiff:
Patricio Martinez Aguilar and Manuel Jesus Arizaga
Defendant:
New Dairydel, Inc., Four Corners Foods Inc., Dklee Realty Corp. D/B/A Bagel Plus Deli and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
USA v. Raymond Lee
as 22-11409
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RAYMOND CHARLES LEE, a.k.a. Pete
Grady v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
as 2:2022cv01043
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Grady
Defendant:
BP America Company, BP Exploration & Production, Inc. and BP America Production Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Avery v. USA
as 3:2022cv00182
Petitioner:
Charles Lee Avery
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
