Cases 21 - 30 of 123
Wiley v. Government
as 3:2021cv00739
Plaintiff:
Christopher George Wiley
Defendant:
Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whiteside v. State of North Carolina
as 1:2021cv00218
Petitioner:
Christopher George Whiteside, Jr.
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hodge v. SSA
as 6:2021cv00116
Plaintiff:
Christopher George Hodge
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Arnone v. County of Dallas
as 21-10597
Defendant / Appellee:
William T. Hill, Jr., in his Individual capacity, County of Dallas County, Texas and Ron Goethals, in his Individual capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher George Arnone
Wilson v. Associated Petroleum Carriers, Inc., et al
as 1:2021cv00158
Defendant:
Petroleum Carriers, Inc., Christopher Lewis Scott, Associated Petroleum Carriers, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tyanna Arlene Wilson, Christopher Lynn Wilson and Christopher George Woodby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GEORGE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv30907
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER GEORGE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOGAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv28848
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER GEORGE COOGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Christopher Follette
as 21-30148
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER GEORGE FOLLETTE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
WALLACE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv23032
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER GEORGE WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
