Cases 21 - 30 of 83
Teasley v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al (PLR2)
as 1:2018cv00193
Defendant:
Jesse Riggins and CSX Transportation, Inc.
Plaintiff:
R. Kenneth Teasley
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Angell et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et. al. (TV1)
as 3:2018cv00313
Plaintiff:
William Hendricks, Sherry McKee, Suhn Brown and others
Defendant:
Union Tank Car Company, CSX Transportation, Inc. and Ralph Brackett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Andrews v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00659
Plaintiff:
Darrel Andrews
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101 Worker Adjustment/Retraining Notification Act
McMaster et al v. CSX Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv00628
Plaintiff:
Dimitrice M. McMaster and Stephen L. McMaster
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc., CSX Corporation, Barthur Batchelor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perez v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jose Menjibar Perez
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Snyder v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (PLR1)
as 1:2017cv00353
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Charles F. Snyder
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Hoblit v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (PLR1)
as 3:2017cv00019
Plaintiff:
Daryl Hoblit
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Staples v. Gentile et al
as 3:2016cv02723
Plaintiff:
Kent B. Staples
Defendant:
Jonathan S. Gentile , Osman M. Gure, Seman Rima and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Owens et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al (TV1)
as 3:2016cv00499
Plaintiff:
Rick A Owens , Dorothy Elizabeth Owens , Kendall Rae Owens and others
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc. and Union Tank Car Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
