Cases 21 - 30 of 80
Stedam v. Cumberland County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2019cv00032
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Anne Stedam
Defendant:
Cumberland County Sheriff's Department and Cumberland County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Corregedore v. Cox et al
as 2:2018cv00065
Defendant:
Jason Powers, Casey Cox, Mark Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Marcel Michael Corregedore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Cumberland County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2018cv00029
Plaintiff:
Melanie Lewis
Defendant:
Cumberland County Sheriff's Department, Cumberland County Jail, Casey Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duckett v. Cumberland County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2018cv00024
Plaintiff:
Dane L. Duckett
Defendant:
Cumberland County Sheriff Department, Casey Cox, Tim Claflin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Cumberland County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2018cv00499
Plaintiff:
William Price
Defendant:
Cumberland County Sheriff's Department, Unknown Party and County of Cumberland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Bailey v. Stig Larson
as 17-7339
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
STIG LARSON, FAYETTEVILLE NORTH CAROLINA POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNKNOWN LT SUPERVISOR and others
Robert Gene Bailey v. Joseph Gardner
as 17-7331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., K. D. MACKEY and others
Robert Bailey v. K. Mackey
as 17-7326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
K. D. MACKEY, C. C. BLAKE, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Robert Bailey v. Stig Larson
as 17-7278
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
STIG LARSON, FAYETTEVILLE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNKNOWN SUPERVISOR and others
Robert Gene Bailey v. John Parsek
as 17-7281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN PARSEK, MARION WILSON, CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE N.C. ZONING DEPARTMENT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
