Cases
Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Creighton v. Fisher et al
as 3:2011cv00288
Petitioner: Larry Creighton
Respondent: Jon Fisher, Frank Campopiano, Maureen McGough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
POWE v. OFFICER SHOVLIN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv02534
Plaintiff: Kent Powe
Defendant: Officer shovlin , F. Royer , David Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POWE v. OFFICER SHOVLIN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00165
Plaintiff: KENT POWE
Defendant: OFFICER SHOVLIN, F. BOYER, DAVID BOWEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
POWE v. SHOVLIN et al
as 2:2009cv06141
Plaintiff: KENT POWE
Defendant: SHOVLIN, ANNE MYERS, SUSAN FARRARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POWE v. MEYERS et al
as 2:2009cv05580
Plaintiff: KENT POWE
Defendant: ANNE MEYERS, SUSAN FARRARO, F. CAMPOPIANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Philip Frazier v. SCI Med Dispensary Doctor, et al
as 09-3771
Plaintiff - Appellant: PHILIP FRAZIER
Defendant - Non-Participating: FRANK CAMPOPIANO, R. L. HEASTER, SCI MED DISPENSARY DOCTOR and others
In re: Philip Frazier, et al
as 09-3145
Plaintiff - Petitioner: In re: PHILIP FRAZIER
Defendant - Respondent: PENNSYLVANIA, JOHN PALAKOVICH, SCI MED DISPENSARY, Doctor +2 Staff Members and others
Nominal Respondent: CHRISTOPHER C CONNER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01322
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Badami et al v. Grassroots Campaigns, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv03465
Plaintiff: Angela Badami, Lennon Bronsema, Benjamin Campopiano and others
Defendant: Grassroots Campaigns, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?