Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Kingvision Pay v. Hernandez Club, et al
as 2:1996cv05912
Movant:
Creative Recovery Concepts Inc
Defendant:
Carlos Estrada, Max E Hernandez, Hernandez Club and others
Receiver:
David R Haberbush
Plaintiff:
Kingvision Pay-Per-View Ltd
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
USA v. Carlos Estrada-Flore
as 10-14150
Plaintiff - Appellee:
USA
Defendant - Appellant:
CARLOS ESTRADA-FLORES, a.k.a. Javier Garcia Flores, a.k.a. Arturo Vega-Garcia
R-G Premier Bank of Puerto Rico v. Estrada-Colon et al
as 3:2010cv01619
Defendant:
Carlos Estrada-Colon, Nannette R Rodriguez, Conjugal Partnership Estrada-Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
R-G Premier Bank of Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1725
Juan Estrada-Luis v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-71828
Petitioner:
JUAN CARLOS ESTRADA-LUIS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Rupert et al v. Winter
as 3:2010cv00799
Plaintiff:
Barry Rupert , Carol Rupert , David Quintos and others
Defendant:
Robert S Winter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Carlos Estrada
as 09-56108
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CARLOS ESTRADA, AKA Carlos Renteria Estrada
Martin Rafael Duenas et al v. Dole Food Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00215
Plaintiff:
Vicente Antonio Guillen Aguilar, Encarnacion Fernandez Amaya, Santiago Amado Funes Ardon and others
Defendant:
Chiquita Brands Company, North America, Chiquita Brands International, Inc., Chiquita Brands, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
USA v. Parra-Mendez
as 08-50911
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
REYMUNDO PARRA-MENDEZ, also known as Ricardo Renteria, also known as Roberto Munoz-Mendez, also known as Roberto Carlos Estrada-Perez, also known as Roberto Munoz, also known as Roberto Gomez-Cruz, also known as Raymundo Melendez-Munoz
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
