Cases 21 - 30 of 96
Rawls v. Walls et al
as 3:2019cv00839
Defendant:
Cyathia Griffin, A. Green, Lavonne Walls and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Ellis Rawls
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Elliott et al
as 3:2019cv00246
Defendant:
Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr v. Rivers
as 3:2019cv00524
Plaintiff:
Russell Carr
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Warden C. Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carr v. Rivers
as 3:2019cv00523
Plaintiff:
Russell Carr
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Warden C. Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jackson Women's Health Organization et al v. Currier et al
as 3:2018cv00171
Plaintiff:
Jackson Women's Health Organization and Sacheen Carr-Ellis
Defendant:
Mary Currier , Mississippi State Board of Medical Licensure , Kenneth Cleveland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramsey v. Carrol et al
as 1:2018cv00336
Defendant:
Harrison County Adult Detention Center, Unknown Polt, Fontenot Carrol and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Ramsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Collums et al
as 3:2018cv00218
Plaintiff:
Barry Carr
Defendant:
John Does 1-2, Pontotoc County, Mississippi and Luke Collums
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carr v. Walmart Stores, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00121
Plaintiff:
Earnestine Carr
Defendant:
Walmart Stores, Inc. , John Doe 1-4 and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beasley v. Carr et al
as 3:2018cv00311
Plaintiff:
Teresa Beasley
Defendant:
Eric Carr and Robert Lang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr v. Commissioner of MODC
as 3:2018cv00151
Plaintiff:
Maurice Carr
Defendant:
Commissioner of MODC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
