Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Davis v. Holbrook
as 2:2017cv00808
Petitioner:
Cecil Emile Davis
Respondent:
Donald Holbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Jones et al v. City of Spokane et al
as 2:2016cv00325
Plaintiff:
Danny Cecil Jones , Nancy Jones , Alyssa Jones and others
Defendant:
City of Spokane , Frank Straub, Kevin King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Morton v. Johanson et al
as 3:2016cv05728
Plaintiff:
Cecil Morton
Defendant:
Vanesa Johanson, Eric Jackson and Patrick R Glebe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Little et al
as 3:2016mc05018
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Albert Cecil Little
Garnishee:
Pacific Crest
Berry v. New York Life Insurance Company
as 4:2016cv05006
Plaintiff:
Cecil R Berry
Defendant:
New York Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Avery v. United States Government et al
as 3:2015cv05330
Plaintiff:
Cecil Avery
Defendant:
United States Government and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Grant et al v. Unigard Indemnity Company et al
as 2:2014cv00198
Plaintiff:
Cecil Grant and Tania Grant
Defendant:
Unigard Indemnity Company , Cunningham Lindsey US, Inc. , Thomas E Johnson and others
Counter_claimant:
Unigard Indemnity Company
Counter_defendant:
Cecil Grant and Tania Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wyatt v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv05003
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Cecil W Wyatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Dudgeon v. Warner
as 3:2013cv05474
Petitioner:
Cecil Dudgeon
Respondent:
Bernard Warner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dudgeon v. Warner
as 3:2012cv06039
Petitioner:
Cecil Dudgeon
Respondent:
Bernard Warner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
