Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00480
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-35801
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Freedom From Religion v. Chino Valley Uni. Sch. Dist., et al
as 16-55425
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
CHINO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, JAMES NA, Chino Valley Unified School District Board of Education Board Member in his official representative capacity, SYLVIA OROZCO, Chino Valley Unified School District Board of Education Board Member in her official representative capacity and others
Intervenor:
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION and ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION MEMBERS KEN WILLIAMS, MARI BARKE, LISA SPARKS, JOHN BEDELL, REBECCA GOMEZ, IN THEIR OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITIES
Amicus Curiae:
JUSTICE AND FREEDOM FUND, ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM, AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE and others
Freedom From Religion v. Chino Valley Uni. Sch. Dist., et al
as 16-55425
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
CHINO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, JAMES NA, Chino Valley Unified School District Board of Education Board Member in his official representative capacity, SYLVIA OROZCO, Chino Valley Unified School District Board of Education Board Member in her official representative capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
JUSTICE AND FREEDOM FUND, ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM, AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE and others
General Synod v. Thom Tillis
as 14-2225
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GENERAL SYNOD OF THE UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST, JOSEPH HOFFMAN, Reverend, NANCY ELLETT ALLISON, Reverend and others
Defendant:
ROY COOPER, Attorney General of North Carolina, DREW REISINGER, Register of Deeds, WAYNE NIXON, Register of Deeds and others
Movant - Appellant:
THOM TILLIS, Speaker of the NC House of Representatives and PHIL BERGER, President Pro Tempore of the NC Senate
James Obergefell, et al v. Richard Hodges, et al
as 14-3057
Amicus Curiae:
WOMEN'S LAW PROJECT, NATIONAL CENTER FOR LESBIAN RIGHTS, GARY J. GATES and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAVID BRIAN MICHENER, ROBERT GRUNN, JAMES OBERGEFELL and others
Defendant:
CAMILLE JONES
Intervenor:
CRAIG SCHEIDLER, EQUALITY OHIO, SARAH RUTH MARSHALL and others
Defendant / Appellant:
THEODORE WYMYSLO, MD, In his official capacity as the Director of the Ohio Department of Health, LANCE D. HIMES, In his official capacity as the Interim Director of The Ohio Department of Health and RICHARD HODGES
USA v. Freeman Burkholder
as 13-3214
Amicus Curiae:
PFLAG INTERNATIONAL, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES, ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FREEMAN BURKHOLDER
USA v. Emanuel Schrock
as 13-3208
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
EMANUEL SCHROCK
Amicus Curiae:
THE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE ON CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS, AMERICAN-ARAB ANTI-DISCRIMINATION COMMITTEE, CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS and others
USA v. Lester Miller
as 13-3204
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LESTER M. MILLER
Amicus Curiae:
THE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE ON CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS, AMERICAN-ARAB ANTI-DISCRIMINATION COMMITTEE, CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS and others
USA v. Lester Mullet
as 13-3202
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LESTER S. MULLET
Amicus Curiae:
THE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE ON CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS, AMERICAN-ARAB ANTI-DISCRIMINATION COMMITTEE, CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
