Cases 21 - 30 of 67
Chapman v. Haynes et al
as 2:2018cv02473
Defendant:
Micheal Long, Jerred Renfrow, Unknown Walik and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Keith Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wheatcroft et al v. Glendale, City of et al
as 2:2018cv02347
Defendant:
Glendale, City of, Michael Fernandez, Mark Lindsey and others
Plaintiff:
Anya Chapman and Johnny Wheatcroft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2018cv02219
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Arizona, State of, Board of Supervisors and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Keith Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2018cv01912
Plaintiff:
Donald Keith Chapman
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Maricopa, County of, Paul Penzone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2018cv00791
Respondent:
Arizona, State of, Maricopa, County of and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Donald Keith Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ostrovsky v. Chapman Ford LLC
as 2:2018cv00281
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ostrovsky
Defendant:
Chapman Ford LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Chapman v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv00100
Plaintiff:
Meghan Chapman
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edmonds #96224 v. Gay et al
as 2:2017cv03902
Plaintiff:
Winston V Edmonds
Defendant:
Maureen Gay, Unknown Girts, Unknown Flake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colter et al v. Holmberg et al
as 4:2017cv00487
Plaintiff:
Roman Colter and Virginia Colter
Defendant:
Jason Holmberg, John G Roberts, Chapman Chevrolet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv01370
Plaintiff:
Robert Chapman
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
