Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Alan Coyne, et al v. Strategic Business Partners LL, et al
as 11-1815
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ALAN COYNE, JAMES MORIARITY, SCOTT SMITH and others
Defendant - Appellant:
STRATEGIC BUSINESS PARTNERS LLC, DAN HOSTETLER and CHARLES ORABUTT
William Steele v. Billy Rowles, et al
as 10-40830
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM CHARLES STEELE
Defendant - Appellee:
BILLY ROWLES, Individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Jasper County, UNKNOWN JAILERS, Indvidually and in their officail capacity as Jasper County Jail Guards and JASPER COUNTY
Wardell Giles v. Gary Campbell, et al
as 10-2353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARDELL LEROY GILES
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY CAMPBELL, ROBERT J. CASSASE and CHARLES STEELE
Wardell Giles v. Gary Campbell, et al
as 10-2049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARDELL LEROY GILES
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY CAMPBELL, ROBERT J. CASSASE and CHARLES STEELE
William Steele v. Billy Rowles, et al
as 09-40941
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM CHARLES STEELE
Defendant - Appellee:
BILLY ROWLES, Individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Jasper County, UNKNOWN JAILERS, Indvidually and in their officail capacity as Jasper County Jail Guards and JASPER COUNTY
Charles Steele v. Mark Richardson, et al
as 08-2147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES STEELE
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK RICHARDSON, ESQ., TONI MEADOWS and MARK W RICHARDSON PC
Steele v. Quarterman
as 08-40379
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM CHARLES STEELE
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
STEELE v. UNITED STATES
as 3:2007cv00247
Petitioner:
JOHN CHARLES STEELE, III
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
STEELE v. RICHARDSON et al
as 2:2007cv03542
Plaintiff:
CHARLES STEELE
Defendant:
MARK RICHARDSON, TONI MEADOWS and MARK W. RICHARDSON, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
