Cases 21 - 30 of 32
McClam v. Thomas et al
as 3:2013cv01682
Plaintiff:
Leo McClam
Defendant:
Janice Thomas, NFN Reddy, NFN McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv02222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavez-Tovar v. Atkinson
as 1:2012cv01310
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Chavez-Tovar
Respondent:
Kenny Atkinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chavez-Romero v. US Department of Education
as 6:2011cv01639
Plaintiff:
Reina Chavez-Romero
Defendant:
US Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 3410
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv00564
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Buckley v. Columbia Care Center et al
as 3:2008cv00970
Plaintiff:
Aaron Buckley
Defendant:
Columbia Care Center, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Eldon Wyatt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Acuna et al v. Monetta Peach Packers et al
as 8:2008cv00420
Plaintiff:
Juan Acuna, Juan Acuna, Felix Antonio Hernandez and others
Defendant:
Monetta Peach Packers, International Labor Management Consultants, Tracy Childers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Abbeville County Detention Center et al
as 0:2007cv04070
Plaintiff:
Trey Chavez Brown
Defendant:
Abbeville County Detention Center, Curtis Killian, Marion Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Brown v. Abbeville County Dentention Center
as 0:2007cv03667
Plaintiff:
Trey Chavez Brown
Defendant:
Abbeville County Dentention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
