Cases 21 - 30 of 191
White v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Edward D White
Defendant:
City of Tulsa and Tulsa Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tubbs v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Paul Tubbs
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, R Russo and Police Officer Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Anderson et al v. Williams et al
as 4:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Patricia Anderson
Defendant:
K Williams, A Perez and City of Tulsa, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rucker v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
Douglas Rucker
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, Michael Snyder, Will Mortensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. Hall et al
as 4:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Eugene James Turner
Defendant:
Amy Hall, Wendell Franklin and City of Tulsa, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montero v. Tulsa Airport Improvements Trust, et al
as 23-5039
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK R. MONTERO
Defendant / Appellee:
TULSA AIRPORT IMPROVEMENTS TRUST, AKA T.A.I.T., CITY OF TULSA and JUDGE TAMMY BRUCE
White v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Edward Dionta White
Defendant:
City of Tulsa and Officer Girard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Girard et al
as 4:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Edward Dionta White
Defendant:
Officer Girard and City of Tulsa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Savage v. State of Oklahoma, The et al
as 4:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Marquice Donnell Savage
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, The, Alison Nutt, Lacy Lansdown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
