Cases 21 - 30 of 428
KENNEDY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2018cv04310
Defendant:
BRIAN SEIDEL, ANNETTE HUNTER, SHIRLEY M. SWAVELY and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arbegast et al v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv01610
Plaintiff:
Zulmira Arbegast and Clyde Arbegast
Defendant:
Dr. Keith Cordischi, Department of Veterans Affairs and The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Henderson et al v. Adams et al
as 1:2018cv01371
Defendant:
Public Defender Catherine Himes, Judge Michael Flannelly, Judge Joseph Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Jackson, Franklin Jackson, Rashi Tyler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAER v. BRADLEY
as 3:2018cv00119
Petitioner:
CLYDE BAER, III
Respondent:
ERIC BRADLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ABRAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv01107
Plaintiff:
RENA ABRAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BLANCHE CARNEY, GERALD MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00022
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
PERRONG v. SMITH et al
as 2:2017cv03366
Plaintiff:
ANDREW R. PERRONG
Defendant:
ANTONIO CLYDE SMITH and LIFE MARKETING GROUP
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Shoop v. Cawley et al
as 3:2017cv00912
Plaintiff:
Clyde Rendell Shoop
Defendant:
Erin K Cawley , Last Chance Ranch and Lori McCutcheon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MCCUSKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2017cv02235
Plaintiff:
EDWARD G. MCCUSKER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FT. DEVENS FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tonkin v. Luzerne County, Pennsylvania
as 4:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
Clyde Tonkin
Defendant:
Luzerne County, Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
