Cases 21 - 30 of 61
Blanding v. Department of Social Services et al
as 5:2017cv03223
Plaintiff:
Vernon L Blanding
Defendant:
Department of Social Services, DSS Caseworker, Pineridge Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamm v. Correct Care Recovery Solutions et al
as 9:2017cv01702
Plaintiff:
Michael E Hamm
Defendant:
Correct Care Recovery Solutions , Timothy Budz , Shelia Lindsay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Davis v. Correct Care Recovery Solutions et al
as 4:2017cv00922
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Davis
Defendant:
Correct Care Recovery Solutions and Stephanie Harry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juste v. Correct Care Recovery Solutions et al
as 4:2016cv03575
Petitioner:
Andre Juste
Respondent:
Correct Care Recovery Solutions and Columbia Regional Care Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Maldonado v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 9:2016cv03467
Plaintiff:
Danielle Star Maldonado
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of, Lexington County Detention Center, Lexington County Sheriffs Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juste v. Columbia Regional Care Center et al
as 4:2016cv02974
Plaintiff:
Andre Juste
Defendant:
Columbia Regional Care Center, Correct Care Solutions, Vernelle Fogle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juste v. Crawford et al
as 4:2016cv02366
Plaintiff:
Andre Juste
Defendant:
N. Crawford, Correct Care Recovery Solutions, Laura Horley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 1:2016cv00261
Plaintiff:
James Muhammad
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Department of Mental Health, The and Isaiah Hemphill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Darby et al
as 4:2016cv00218
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lamar Wright
Defendant:
Dr. Darby, Dr. Randolph, Dr. Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
