Cases 21 - 30 of 79
Bennett v. Core Civic Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00067
Plaintiff:
Brandon Cordell Bennett
Defendant:
Core Civic Inc., Crossroads Correctional Center, P. McTighe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson Bey v. Pash et al
as 5:2018cv06012
Plaintiff:
Orlando Watson Bey
Defendant:
Ronda Pash, Crossroads Correctional Center Maximum Security Officials, Crossroads Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stops v. Core Civic Services-Crossroads Correctional Center et al
as 4:2017cv00052
Plaintiff:
Malachi Dean Stops
Defendant:
Core Civic Services-Crossroads Correctional Center, Douglas Fender and Correctional Officer Bamke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pennell v. Pash
as 4:2017cv00849
Petitioner:
Michael M. Pennell
Defendant:
Scanning Program - Crossroads Correctional Center
Respondent:
Ronda Pash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Murie v. Crossroads Correctional Center
as 4:2017cv00005
Plaintiff:
Jacob Ryan Murie
Defendant:
Crossroads Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fournier v. Crossroads Correctional Center et al
as 4:2016cv00125
Plaintiff:
Sean Lance Fournier
Defendant:
Crossroads Correctional Center, Ms. Bowen, Mike Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonio Richardson v. Ronda Pash
as 16-4255
Petitioner:
Antonio Richardson
Respondent:
Ronda J. Pash, Superintendent, Crossroads Correctional Center
Joseph Clark v. Larry Denney
as 16-3883
Petitioner:
Joseph Andre Clark
Respondent:
Larry Denney, Superintendent, Crossroads Correctional Center
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Raedeke v. Pash
as 4:2016cv01092
Petitioner:
Eric Raedeke
Defendant:
Scanning Program - Crossroads Correctional Center
Respondent:
Ronda J. Pash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
