Cases 21 - 30 of 241
Boyes v. Young et al
as 2:2021cv00483
Plaintiff:
Todd W. Boyes
Defendant:
John Young, Curtis Dixon, Betsy Jividen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Dixion et al
as 2:2020cv00688
Defendant:
Curtis Dixion, Jarrod Wilson, Brenda Ward and others
Plaintiff:
Steven M. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. McDowell County Commission et al
as 1:2020cv00268
Plaintiff:
Curtis Bailey
Defendant:
Sgt. Aaron Cantrell, CO John Does, McDowell County Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. 84.53 acres of land, more or less, in Calhoun, Marshall, Ritchie, Tyler and Wetzel Counties West Virginia et al
as 1:2018cv00009
Defendant:
Stephen M. Fye and Nancy F. Fye, Daisy Beardshaw, Janice F. Brookover and others
Plaintiff:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Hamrick v. USA
as 5:2019cv00289
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rodney Curtis Hamrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Chappelle v. Minnix et al
as 2:2019cv00003
Defendant:
Lt. Christopher Wymer, Doe No. 5, Doe No. 4 and others
Plaintiff:
James Curtis Chappelle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
WATSON v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 3:2018cv00090
Petitioner:
Curtis Lee Watson
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Granberry et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00907
Plaintiff:
Terri Renee Granberry and James Curtis Granberry
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franklin v. Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company
as 1:2018cv00587
Plaintiff:
Darlenna Franklin and Curtis Franklin
Defendant:
Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
