Cases 21 - 30 of 307
Schatz v REV Recreation Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00700
Defendant:
Daniel James Schatz, REV Recreation Group Inc and Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
RATHKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv18296
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JAMES RATHKE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hyman v. New Mexico State University et al
as 2:2023cv00547
Plaintiff:
Dr. Michael R Hyman
Defendant:
New Mexico State University, The Board of Regents of New Mexico State University, Department Head David Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Fassbender v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2023cv00486
Plaintiff:
Evan R Fassbender
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Tony Evers, Kirsten Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crumley v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
as 8:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Crumley
Defendant:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
GARFIELD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JAMES GARFIELD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gallant v. Sproul
as 3:2023cv00005
Petitioner:
Daniel James Gallant
Respondent:
Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Megge v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03973
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Megge
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PULLEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19597
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JAMES PULLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
IROVANDO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19430
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JAMES IROVANDO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
