Cases 21 - 30 of 196
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv03171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Martinez Galindo et al v. Space 86 Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv02818
Plaintiff:
Alexis Daniel Martinez Galindo
Defendant:
Space 86 Corp. doing business as Space Market and Pang Gi Lee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
US v. Juan Martinez
as 23-4276
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN DANIEL MARTINEZ, a/k/a Amigo
John Bright v. City of Santa Maria et al
as 2:2022cv08344
Plaintiff:
John Bright
Defendant:
City of Santa Maria, Chief Phil Hansen, Sgt. Jesus Valle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARTINEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv02927
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MARTINEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sanabria-Dominguez, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1658
Petitioner:
ANA BEATRIZ SANABRIA-DOMINGUEZ, ALDRIN ESTUARDO MARTINEZ-SANABRIA and JOSHUA DANIEL MARTINEZ-SANABRIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
MARTINEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05294
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE MARTINEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Progressive Express Insurance Company v. Tate Transport Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv00198
Defendant:
Islamarti LLC, Alberto Daniel Martinez, Islary Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
Progressive Express Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Mitchell v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Kyre Mitchell
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, Kerr Putney, Johnny Lee Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel Martinez v. Catricia Howard
as 22-16988
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL MARTINEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
CATRICIA HOWARD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
