Cases 21 - 30 of 49
PRINTUP v. KNIGHT et al
as 2:2021cv00280
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, CURTIS DUNCAN, HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowes-Northern v. Miller et al
as 2:2021cv00085
Defendant:
Latesha C. Miller and Darius Woods
Plaintiff:
Shedrick Bowes-Northern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
COOPER v. EVANSVILLE STATE HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2020cv00405
Plaintiff:
DARIUS M. COOPER
Defendant:
JAMES ORGAN, NORMA ORGAN, WELLBUTRIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOPER v. PLASSE et al
as 2:2020cv00401
Plaintiff:
DARIUS MONTEL COOPER
Defendant:
JOHN PLASSE, JAMES B. ORGAN, VIGO COUNTY COURT HOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PETERSON et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv04480
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PETERSON and SHARINA PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WRIGHT et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv03917
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
DARIUS DENARD WRIGHT and DEIDRA ROSSELL WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STATEN v. KNIGHT
as 1:2017cv02363
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
DARIUS STATEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Superintendent
as 3:2017cv00063
Petitioner:
Darius Washington
Respondent:
Superintendent
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mayweather-Brown v. Rodgers et al
as 3:2016cv00755
Plaintiff:
Quintin Jamar Mayweather-Brown
Defendant:
Brad Rodgers, Jhon Perry, Steffany Bigler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
