Cases 21 - 30 of 436
Alsip v. Warden David Paul
as 5:2023cv00344
Petitioner:
Hachelle Alsip
Respondent:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Alsip v. Warden David Paul
as 5:2023cv00337
Petitioner:
Hachelle Alsip
Respondent:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Casab v. Walmart Stores Inc., et al.
as 23-4088
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID PAUL CASAB
Defendant / Appellee:
WALMART STORES INC., WALMART INC., doing business as Walmart #5269 and WALMART NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET
Krikie v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv02719
Petitioner:
David Paul Krikie
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Bickford v. Director of Patuxent Institution
as 23-7159
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID PAUL BICKFORD
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, EASTERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and DIRECTOR OF PATUXENT INSTITUTION
Bernick v. Warden David Paul
as 5:2023cv00316
Petitioner:
Michael Bernick
Respondent:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
John Frazer v. USA, et al
as 23-5904
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN J. FRAZER
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DAVID PAUL, Warden, Federal Medical Center Lexington
DETWEILER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12962
Plaintiff:
DAVID PAUL DETWEILER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MENETREY v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv02097
Plaintiff:
DAVID PAUL MENETREY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
