Cases 21 - 30 of 2,607
DAVIS v. WAWA
as 2:2024cv01533
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY DAVIS
Defendant:
WAWA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Davis v. AMCO Insurance Company et al
as 1:2024cv00632
Plaintiff:
Marguerite Davis
Defendant:
AMCO Insurance Company and Nationwide Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
IGLESIAS v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
DAVIS IGLESIAS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL ZAKEN, MS. KOIS and S. LONGSTRETH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MORGAN v. ORTIZ et al
as 2:2024cv01190
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MORGAN
Defendant:
OFFICER ALEJANDRO ORTIZ, CORPORAL JARED DAVIS and COATESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHESTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin et al v. Novo Nordisk, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01149
Plaintiff:
Tommie Austin, Paulsen Bronston, Patricia Brooks and others
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC., NOVO NORDISK PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES L.P., NOVO NORDISK RESEARCH CENTER SEATTLE INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
DAVIS v. USA
as 2:2024cv00334
Petitioner:
IKLAS RICHARD DAVIS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
DAVIS v. USA
as 2:2024cv00335
Petitioner:
IKLAS RICHARD DAVIS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00421
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DAVIS v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
LOVELL A. DAVIS, III
Defendant:
WARDEN UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
