Cases 21 - 29 of 29
SPADY et al v. BEARD et al
as 2:2008cv01599
Plaintiff:
DEVIN X. SPADY, JOSEPH LAURENSAU, EVOL YOUNG and others
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, JOHN D. SCHAFFER, DAVID J. WAKEFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HOWARD et al v. JONES et al
as 1:2008cv00308
Plaintiff:
MORRIS HOWARD, SHAWN BROWN, JOSEPH MCGOLGON and others
Defendant:
JEFFREY BEARD, RAYMOND SOBINA, BARONE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BAILEY v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2008cv01115
Petitioner:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Trustee:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BAILEY v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2008cv00647
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant:
LOUIS FOLINO, DIANE THOMAS, DANIEL DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. McMahon et al
as 1:2007cv02238
Plaintiff:
Jamiel Johnson, Dwayne Combs, Josh Griffin and others
Defendant:
Melissa McMahon, Jill Novell, K. Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Victor, et al. v. Lawler et al
as 3:2007cv02058
Plaintiff:
William Victor and Demetrius Bailey
Defendant:
R. M. Lawler, M. W. Harlow, Dorina Varner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY et al v. BEARD et al
as 2:2007cv03723
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY, ANTHONY LOCKE, COREY SMITH and others
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD and ROBERT S. BITNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. WAKEFIELD et al
as 2:2007cv01122
Petitioner:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Respondent:
DAVID WAKEFIELD, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BAILEY et al v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2007cv00719
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY and SCOTT DRAKE
Defendant:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, SYLVIA PALLOTT, MARY CANINO and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
