Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Mays v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2017cv00048
Plaintiff:
Paul Mays
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Webb Strange, Cordant Health Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence v. Dismas Charities, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00149
Plaintiff:
Sandy G. Lawrence
Defendant:
Dismas Charities, Inc. , Dismas Charities Properties, Inc. , Dismas Charities Foundation, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayberry v. Dismas Charities, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00069
Plaintiff:
Latoya Mayberry
Defendant:
Dismas Charities, Inc. and Mark Meredith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tilga et al v. Dismas Charities, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00954
Defendant:
Dismas Charities, Inc. and Will J. Prater
Plaintiff:
Carolynne Tilga and Adella Abeita
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Susser v. Dismas Charities, Inc.
as 0:2015cv62223
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Maria Susser
Defendant:
Dismas Charities, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BANNUM, INC. v. USA
as 1:2015cv00440
Plaintiff:
BANNUM, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor_defendant:
DISMAS CHARITIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Peel v. Woods et al
as 5:2015cv00008
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Peel
Defendant:
Michael Woods, Marita Dunn, Tara Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith et al v. Dismas Charities, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00489
Plaintiff:
Joseph Smith and Justin Rapp
Defendant:
Dismas Charities, Inc. , Dismas Charities Properties, Inc. and Dismas Charities FDN., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tilga et al v. United States et al
as 1:2014cv00256
Plaintiff:
Carolynne Tilga and Adella Abeita
Defendant:
United States of America, Dismas Charities, Inc. and Will J Prater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
BANNUM, INC. v. USA
as 1:2014cv00140
Plaintiff:
BANNUM, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor_defendant:
DISMAS CHARITIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
