Cases 21 - 30 of 62
Anderson v. Doe #1 et al
as 4:2018cv00710
Defendant:
John Doe #2, John Doe #4, John Doe #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Micah Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blatner v. Ochs et al
as 1:2018cv00186
Defendant:
John Doe #4, John Doe #1, Charles Ochs and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Keith Blatner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spillman v. Arnott et al
as 6:2018cv03207
Defendant:
John Doe 3, John Doe 2, John Doe 5 and others
Plaintiff:
Carson T Spillman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGee v. Arnott et al
as 6:2018cv03208
Defendant:
Jim Arnott, John Doe 3, Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel L McGee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. McSwain et al
as 2:2017cv04034
Plaintiff:
Roy Taylor
Defendant:
Ellis McSwain, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phyllis Schafly Revocable Trust et al v. Cori et al
as 4:2016cv01631
Plaintiff:
Eagle Trust Fund and Phyllis Schlafly Revocable Trust
Defendant:
Anne Cori , Eunie Smith , Cathie Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Schmidt v. Willoughby et al
as 1:2016cv00160
Plaintiff:
Justin L. Schmidt
Defendant:
Robert Willoughby , John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J. Doe 1 et al v. Avid Life Media, Inc., et al
as 4:2015cv01879
Defendant:
Avid Life Media, Inc. and Avid Dating Life, Inc.
Plaintiff:
J. Doe 1 , J. Doe 2 , J. Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IN RE: ASHLEY MADISON CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION
as 4:2015md02669
Plaintiff:
John Does 1-21, David Miller, Nhung Truong and others
Defendant:
Avid Dating Life, Inc., Noel Biderman, Barnes & Thornburg LLP and others
Petitioner:
Amicus Doe 1, Amicus Doe 3, Amicus Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Lee v. Cassady et al
as 2:2015cv04199
Plaintiff:
Vincent X Lee
Defendant:
Jay Cassady, Bill Armontrout, Donald Wyrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
