Cases 21 - 30 of 51
CUNEO v. TOWNSHIP OF WEST DEPTFORD et al
as 1:2017cv05213
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JAMES CUNEO
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF WEST DEPTFORD, SAMUEL DISIMONE, JAMES A CREEDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DONAHUE v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2017cv02750
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M. DONAHUE
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DAVID OWENS and KATE TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DONAHUE v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06413
Plaintiff:
JEREMY T. DONAHUE
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv03827
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv03808
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
DONAHUE v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
as 2:2014cv03567
Plaintiff:
JOHN DONAHUE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01597
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BALSAM et al v. GUADAGNO
as 2:2014cv01388
Plaintiff:
MARK BALSAM , CHARLES DONAHUE , HANS HENKES and others
Defendant:
KIM GUADAGNO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DONAHUE et al v. TARGET CORPORATION et al
as 1:2013cv05737
Plaintiff:
ROSE DONAHUE and KEVIN DONAHUE
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION , JOHN DOE(S) (1-5), ABC PARTNERSHIP and others
Cross_claimant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cross_defendant:
ABC PARTNERSHIP, JOHN DOE(S) (1-5) and XYZ CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WHERRY v. COLE et al
as 1:2013cv02144
Petitioner:
BENJAMIN J. WHERRY, SR.
Respondent:
COLE, FCI FORT DIX, DONAHUE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
