Cases 21 - 30 of 463
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dorris v. William Beaumont Hospital et al
as 2:2023cv11272
Plaintiff:
Taveya Dorris
Defendant:
William Beaumont Hospital and Corewell Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Haney v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01043
Plaintiff:
Joshua Haney
Defendant:
DOC, State of Oregon, Warren G. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DORRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19050
Plaintiff:
CHARQUENETTA DORRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pair et al v. Postal Fleet Services Inc et al
as 3:2023cv00785
Plaintiff:
Joshua Pair and William Garner
Defendant:
Postal Fleet Services, Inc., The Stageline Company, Vilano Employment Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DePaoli v. Serna et al
as 1:2023cv00438
Plaintiff:
John C. DePaoli
Defendant:
Marco P. Serna, Dorrie Biaginti-Smith, Alan Kirk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dorris v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01902
Plaintiff:
Frans Dorris
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WAGNER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16289
Plaintiff:
DORRIE WAGNER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dorris v. Suwanee County School District
as 3:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
LISA DORRIS
Defendant:
SUWANEE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD and Suwanee County School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DORRIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12914
Plaintiff:
CARL DORRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
