Cases 21 - 30 of 148
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lewis v. Rardin et al
as 0:2023cv02746
Plaintiff:
David J. Lewis
Defendant:
Warden Jared Rardin, Dr. Elaine York and A. Herzog
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Laughlin v. Hart
as 0:2023cv02503
Plaintiff:
Timothy O'Laughlin
Defendant:
Dr. Diane Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hubbard v. Schnell et al
as 0:2023cv02381
Plaintiff:
Eddie Nile Hubbard
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Lt. Duffy, Sgt. Parr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hanlon v. Schnell et al
as 0:2023cv02233
Plaintiff:
Marco Quinton Hanlon
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Michelle Smith, Transgender Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. County of Ramsey et al
as 0:2023cv02186
Plaintiff:
Stephan Nicholas Holmes
Defendant:
County of Ramsey, Ramsey County Public Health, Kristen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daywitt et al v. Harpstead et al
as 0:2023cv02110
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Steven Daywitt, Joseph Franciosa Thomas, Kenneth Gernard Parks and others
Defendant:
Jodi Harpstead, Nancy Johnston, Jannine Hebert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Mullins v. Morgan et al
as 0:2023cv01855
Plaintiff:
Gary Mullins, Jr
Defendant:
Dr. Morgan, Dr. Jordan, Nurse Wolfe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv01736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jensen v. Minnesota Board of Medical Practice et al
as 0:2023cv01689
Plaintiff:
Dr. Scott Jensen
Defendant:
Minnesota Board of Medical Practice, Ruth Martinez, Elizabeth A. Huntley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
