Cases 21 - 30 of 45
MCKINLEY v. MCFADDEN, ET AL. et al
as 2:2016cv01605
Plaintiff:
KEVIN VASHAUN MCKINLEY
Defendant:
D. EDWARD MCFADDEN and KAREN MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILTON v. COUNTY OF CHESTER, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2014cv02219
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. HILTON
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CHESTER, PENNSYLVANIA , CHESTER COUNTY PRISON and D. EDWARD MCFADDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Justin Credico v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 14-1527
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, EDWARD MCFADDEN and DISTRICT ATTORNEY CHESTER COUNTY
POTTS v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2013cv05164
Plaintiff:
JIMMY POTTS
Defendant:
EDWARD MCFADDEN , RON PHILLIPS , WALTER REED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHELTON v. COUNTY OF CHESTER et al
as 5:2013cv04667
Plaintiff:
LISA MARIE SHELTON
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CHESTER , RYAN COSTELLO , KATHI COZZONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PRYCE v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2013cv02237
Plaintiff:
DAVID PRYCE, III
Defendant:
EDWARD MCFADDEN and CHESTER COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HYNSON v. WILSON et al
as 2:2013cv00614
Plaintiff:
SHAMEK HASAN HYNSON
Defendant:
ROBERT WILSON, EDWARD MCFADDEN, MORGAN TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MINTON v. GUYER et al
as 2:2012cv06162
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY MINTON
Defendant:
DALE S. GUYER, D. EDWARD MCFADDEN and CHESTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2012cv05673
Plaintiff:
BRUCE C. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
D. EDWARD MCFADDEN, RONALD PHILLIPS, WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOOD v. WHITE et al
as 2:2012cv03860
Plaintiff:
WALTER M. WOOD, IV
Defendant:
CARROLE WHITE, MICHAEL GREENE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
